What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower can lead to many potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.