Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.