Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

While  safe distance from cell tower  sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Furthermore,  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.