Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. safe distance to live from cell phone tower include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. safe distance from cell tower are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.