Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is also the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.