Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.